That's... that's actually a pretty good point in favor of Bard's slot not being scum and I can't even blame the people voting me over banana with that reasoning. If it wasn't for the claim seeming like absolute 1v1 material I'd unvote banana off that myself.
I feel like I should be refuting it but I really just don't see a way to beyond "Maybe Bard just got frustrated and decided he really didn't want to play Mafia after all so it's best just replace when it's still ed1"? Banana hasn't existed all game so there's not anything to really case them with other than over their claim, which I've done. :S And of course, the nonexistence itself. I'm not sure where to go from here???
Can you go a bit further on this idea right now you have right now?
I'm not sure how to go further on it. BBM's role confirms actions on a target, so it confirms my backup as existing. Since scum should be pretty much forced to deal with a jailkeeper existing, especially as numbers dwindle, me and BBM might actually be able to both get our actions off; especially after a scum flip since a lone scum -really- won't have the time to stop us unless they let the JK keep doing their thing for additional nights instead. And, with all these VT claims and only one scum left, my tracking is suddenly copping-tier; lone scum HAS to be acting to have any hope of winning, and unless they're a ninja (which tbf we seem to have a ninja roleblocker but maybe it's banana!!) then a tracker is really all you need to catch'em.
Cut by... huh. Are you suggesting the scumteam is BBM/Disquieted? But where does Banana fit in? I guess if there's 4 scum that could make sense. BBM's claim seemed pretty fluid tho'. I guess theoretically if Banana was the jailkeeper backup but the jailkeeper is scum banana could be town, but town stealing the scum jk would be so swingy.